Rhetorical Analysis Deborah Tannen - 906 Words

Rhetorical Analysis Deborah Tannen is a professor in linguistics at Georgetown University. She studies the different patterns of language, like talking to people at work, friends, family, politics, academics, law, and how the ways we talk affect relationships with others. In her essay, â€Å"Oh, Mom. Oh, Honey. : Why Do You Have to Say That? † The author’s purpose in this essay is about how mother and daughter relationships are, and what the mother is trying to say to the daughter, when talking to her. The reason behind the author’s purpose, is because her own mother was gradually getting weak. She started spending more time with her mother and caring for her. When her mom died, it transformed her thinking about mother and daughter relationships. She uses real life experiences and dialect to convey her intentions to the reader. In the essay, the author uses research and conducted interviews that she found about mother and daughter relationships, to show the actual meaning to w hat mothers are saying to their daughters when communicating. The author’s uses dialect to show how mothers and daughters talk to each other. For example, â€Å"Do you think you would have accomplished all of this if you had stayed married?† â€Å"Absolutely not,† I said. â€Å"If I’d stayed married, I wouldn’t have gone to grad school to get my PhD.† â€Å"Well,† she replied, â€Å"If you’d stayed married you wouldn’t have had to† (pg. 918-919).This shows the communication between most moms and their daughters. TannenShow MoreRelatedRhetorical Analysis : Deborah Tannen1485 Words   |  6 Pagesand sure enough a buddy of mine would routinely play devil’s advocate and disagree. â€Å"Boys are expected to use language to seize center stage: by exhibiting their skill, displaying their knowledge, and challenging and resisting challenges† (Tannen). Deborah Tannen makes a host of claims in her essay, but only the point on how men and women communicate differently in class caught my attention. She states that a greater percentage of discussion time in class is taken up by men. In my high school thisRead MoreRhetorical Analysis on Deborah Tannens Argument Culture1247 Words   |  5 PagesA Move towards Better Communication Deborah Tannen graduated from The University of California, Berkely, M.A. in 1979 with her PHD in Linguistics. She is a professor of linguistics at Georgetown University. Tannen has written many books where she applies her theory of Linguistics to everyday situations. Some of her books are: That’s Not What I Meant!: How Conversational Style Makes or Breaks Relationship (1986), Talking from 9 to 5: How Women’s and Men’s ConversationalRead MoreAn Examination on Sociocultural â€Å"Marking† of Women – Rhetorical Analysis of â€Å"There Is No Unmarked Woman† by Deborah Tanen1835 Words   |  8 PagesNicole Carper Professor M. Keith English 1101, sec. C20 08 November 2012 An Examination On Sociocultural â€Å"Marking† of Women – Rhetorical Analysis of â€Å"There Is No Unmarked Woman† by Deborah Tanen What is it that makes a woman a woman, or what makes a man a man? Deborah Tannen, author and Ph.D. of linguistics, investigates this question within the essay, â€Å"There Is No Unmarked Woman.† An excerpt from a larger publication, â€Å"Talking from 9 to 5,† written in 1994, â€Å"There Is No Unmarked Woman† isRead More‘Everyday Creativity Is Always Dialogical in Bakhtin’s Sense’.1965 Words   |  8 Pagesword or phrase will always carry connotations from previous use in various social contexts as well as â€Å"a taste of previous speakers’ intentions.† (Maybin, 2006, p.419) Deborah Tannen draws on Bakhtinian ideas in relation to reported speech, providing evidence for the heteroglossic and dialogic nature of language use. Tannen argues that reported speech in conversation is far from accurately ‘reported’ but is in fact constructed. She illustrates that in the new reporting context, reported utterancesRead MoreCMNS 304 Notes Essay5778 Words   |  24 Pagesexpressive how I feel Can you please turn of your cellphone - directive Ill be back - commisives committing to a certain action We are like fish in water, we don’t have to think about the frame of water, or rather how we interact with it Frame analysis is a tool to step into our frame and understand it this room is just a piece of SFU Frames have a coherence-inducing feature. We expect things to hold together and cohesion is a meshing of text. Coherence (making sense of how they work together)